DIRDEM     July 2010

 

Home

Mission

Join us

 




Home

Civil Liberty
Climate and Population
Coalitions
Constitution
Courts and Judicial System
Electoral Reform

Election Promises
Engaging the Citizen
Europe
Experts
Government
Impeachment
International Politics
Legislation
Lobbies and Special Interests
Media
Narrow Election Results
Parliament
Party Funding
Petition
Political Parties
Politicians
Politician's Pay
Recall Politicians
Referendum
Separation of Powers
Swiss Model
Taxation
Trust in Government



 

 





 




 

 


 

 

Referendum


 

Two kinds of referendum

We propose the introduction of mandatory confirmation of all major legislation and expenditure by the holding of referenda (on a national, regional and local level). We propose the introduction of facultative referenda on other legislation if a certain number of voters can be mobilised (subject to a quorum)


How not to conduct a referendum

Transport Politicians all over the world are given the impression that the £8 congestion charge that drivers into central London have to pay has been a success. They are keen to emulate this measure and pile another tax onto the already overtaxed citizen.
An extra argument in favour of the London tax is the claim that the citizen's of London had been 'consulted'. We beg to differ as there was no proper legally-binding referendum. A key question that is always overlooked is also the problem of the wider implications of such a charge. The present charge is arbitrary and discriminatory: people inside the zone are not taxed at all, they pay no tax driving through zones that are nearby. Only in a patchwork of arbitrary rules that constitute the so-called 'unwritten' British Constitution is it possible to introduce taxes that are levied only on a certain part of the population. Why is it not possible that areas that surround Inner London levy a tax on those that pass through them on their way into and out of London? Should there not have been separate referenda inside and outside the charging zone and only a clear majority in both votes would have been a signal to introduce the congestion tax? Why not vote on the level of the tax, and what provisions are made on how to repeal the charge when a sufficient number of citizens wants to abolish or change it


When is a referendum representative?

Quite often the outcome of a referendum is decided by a narrow margin. But can one really say, that a majority of 1 or even 3 percentage points is a sufficient mandate for change? And change it always is because otherwise there would not have been the need to hold a referendum. I think that certainly the more important decisions should only be approved with a two-thirds majority. In addition, at least 50 percent of those entitled to vote should have cast their vote?



Why qualifying quorum is necessary part of referendum

Yesterday the Portuguese were given the chance to vote on the introduction of a more liberal abortion regime. 59 percent were in favour and 44 percent of those eligible to vote took part. This means that only about a quarter of all possible voters were actually in favour of the measure. As one can assume that those voters in favour had more motivation to participate in the referendum there is an inherent bias in favour of adoption in most referendum campaigns. In order to counteract this factor is is essential that only those measures that are backed by a qualified majority of the electorate get adopted. A quorum of 50 percent of the electorate and a two-thirds majority in important issues appears reasonable.




Decisions you would be able to influence:

By giving the reader examples of recent policy decisions we highlight the dramatic impact the introduction of Direct Democracy would have on the political life of all countries.

All the following decisions where taken without the participation of the affected citizens. Some - if not most - were highly controversial and have a negative effect for at least some major parts of the country's population.

The present system of government not only leaves the citizens powerless in the face of a never-ending tide of legislation, it also inevitably leads to inefficient use of taxpayer's money and a steady erosion of civil liberties.

Full list of decisions the citizens could influence


GENERAL


Nuclear Powers impose further sanctions on Iran

Should former politicians be allowed to cash in from books and lecture tours?

Unequal regional distribution of tax burden

Forum demands that climate tax be redistributed on global basis




CLIMATE CHANGE AND POPULATION

Cap-and-Trade of Carbon Permits and ideal vehicle for fraud

Green Energy plan may cost 17 times more than its benefits



EUROPE

European Council members must put interest of the Union above those of their own countries (Lisbon Treaty, Article 9)

EU prepares expanded sanctions against Iran

MEP wants tax on carbon-intensive products

EU wants introduction of body scanners on Airports



UNITED KINGDOM

Minister states: British forces will be among the last to come home from Afghanistan

Wind farms will increasingly dominate most picturesque landscapes

7.6 billion car trip entries stored by police



DEUTSCHLAND

Solar Subventionen erreichen 85 Mrd. Euro

Neue Steuer auf USB Medien

Hartz IV Empfaenger zahlen nicht fuer Strom, Gas


OESTERREICH

Transparenzkonto: Parteifinanzen ausgenommen

Feinstaubkompetenz fuer Laender und Gemeinden

Mehrwertsteuergrenze manipuliert



 

 

 Disclaimer l Home
Copyright Dirdem 2010 All rights reserved