DIRDEM    

 

Home

Mission

April 2012 Join us

 


Home

Blog

Civil Liberty
Coalitions
Constitution
Courts and Judicial System
Electoral Reform

Election Promises
Engaging the Citizen
Europe
Experts
Government
Legislation
Lobbies and Special Interests
Media
Narrow Election Results
Parliament
Party Funding
Petition
Political Parties
Politicians
Politician's Pay
Recall and Term Limit
Referendum
Separation of Powers
Swiss Model
Third Party
Tax and Public Spending
Trust in Government



 

 





 




 

 


 

 

Government for Sale?


Rich donors get invited to State Dinner. This abuse of privilege is perpetrated by politicians from all parties. It demonstrates the need for giving the citizens a safety valve so that all decisions made by government and influenced by lobbyists can be checked at the ballot box.
15-Mar-2012


Wrong question


"Will Mitt Romney be a bigger spender than President Obama?" asks a headline. But in a proper democratic system no politician should have it in his power to be a 'spender' (of other people's money) as all his decisions would ultimately have to be sanctioned by the citizens.
14-Mar-2012


EU: Does anyone think this is democratic?


Only nine out of 17 members of the Eurozone need to ratify before the treaty becomes law. The new treaty to impose tighter discipline among the 17 nations in the European Union that use the Euro states that the treaty will enter into force "on the first day of the month following the deposit of the ninth instrument of ratification by a contracting party whose currency is the euro."
17-Dec-2011


Cameron under fire - Britain accused of blocking European project


We do not have an axe to grind with respect to the issues discussed at last Friday's European Summit. But before one listens to the hysterical accusations thrown at the British Prime Minister and Britain by the EU political and media establishment one should give at least a cheer for the fact that another backroom deal agreed by the European 'Elites' behind the backs of their citizens has been torpedoed. It is exactly for this type of situation that a strict regime of Direct Democracy in all member states as well as in the EU institutions is required.
10-Dec-2011

 

Referendums - too important to be left to Politicians


Possible changes to the fiscal regime in Euro zone countries mean that one of the most important democratic rights - the decision over taxes and government spending - would be taken from national electorates and vested in a supranational bureaucracy only vaguely accountable to the citizens. Even worse - some even go so far as to give the EU Courts the final say. This would mean that technocrats that owe their primary allegiance to murky backroom deals between political parties in their home country would be able to issue dictats to the citizens of states that do no toe the line. Initial calls for a referendum to sanction the transfer of power to the EU and its acolytes are - not surprisingly - already being stonewalled by the political establishment. This demonstrates the urgent need to take the decision about whether or not to hold a referendum on any legislation out of the hand of the political machines running our lives at present.
3-Dec-2011


 

How not to hold a referendum


The inhabitants of a small rural township in Austria had to vote on the proposed merger of three neighbouring councils. The amalgamation was intended to cut down administrative costs. The result of the referendum was a resounding no as 90.3 % of the voters rejected the proposal. In our view this was a flawed proposal as the voters never had to make an honest choice that was impacting their own pocket book. Expenses for local administrative units are mostly paid for by central government funds. Only if the voters would have to bear the full cost of administering their local government unit would they have been in a position to assess the full consequences of their vote.
28-Nov-2011

 

 

65 % believe politicians can be bought


Says an opinion survey in Austria. That does not necessarily mean that this view can be found in all other countries (though in some the percentage may be even higher) but we would venture a guess that the results would not be more flattering in most countries. The regulation of party and campaign financing as well as the end to state subsidies and hidden financing (such as advertising in party-controlled media outlets) is essential to restore faith in elected representatives. The lack of direct democracy is responsible for the fact that the electorate seems to be resigned to this lamentable state of affairs. Only direct control of political decision making would make it possible to enforce adherence to stricter moral standards in political life.
27-Nov-2011


How to control the influence of money in politics


Reports that property developers have been major donors to the Conservative Party in the UK highlight the role that money plays in politics. Some rich individuals blatantly spend their wealth on getting elected to public office (Schwarzenegger, Bloom berg, Corzine in the USA come to mind) while at the other end of the spectrum the hapless citizen-taxpayer is powerless to stop the gravy-train of public subsidy to the establishment parties in countries like Germany and Austria. Dirdem would at least give the voter a say in the regulation of party finances. In addition the requirement (or mere threat) to hold a referendum on any issue will make the outcome of any political decision subject to the approval of the electorate thus providing a safety-valve against behind-the-scenes manoeuvring.
25-Nov-2011


New unelected regimes in Greece, Italy


Whatever one thinks about the newly-appointed heads of government in these two countries - one thing is clear: they demonstrate the deeply undemocratic political structures prevalent in most Western 'democracies' where the most important position in government is - via their control of parliaments - in the gift of party bureaucracies.
13-Nov-2011

Regime Change in Europe: Do Greece and Italy amount to a banker's coup? (Time)

Spanish Voters bemoan lack of electoral choice (Financial Times)

Megabanks seize control of Europe
(Market Oracle)


How many signatures for referendum?


Occasionally critics of Direct Democracy remark that proposals to launch a binding referendum do not get the support of sufficiently large numbers of signatories. But it has to be considered that collecting them is an uphill task and the launch of such a Campaign often has to be at the expense (in money and time) of volunteers. The trigger point to make a referendum proposal binding must therefore set at a point that is not too low (in order to avoid nuisance proposals) and not too high (so as not to make most or all proposals ineffective).
10-Nov-2011
 

Danger of Ad-hoc Referendums


The problem with ad-hoc referendums is that they are being abused by both parties involved: The proponents (usually the party in power) wants to get additional legitimacy for a decision it has already taken (or wants to wash its hands of a difficult decision). The voters may use the opportunity to cast a vote on the government of the day and not really address the issue at stake. As the only way a referendum can exist in most 'democracies' is by government decree there is a permanent question mark about the whole exercise. These deficiencies are often used by opponents of direct democracy to paint the instrument of referendum in an unattractive light.
8-Nov-2011
 

Too many laws


One of the problems that has been highlighted by the 'Greek tragedy' is the tremendous number of new laws that has been created in that country over the past decades.

But Greece is not alone. All modern 'Democracies' are spewing out page after page of (often poorly worded) laws that have been pushed through by the party machine that happens to hold power at the moment.

While the introduction of Direct Democracy would not mean that no new laws will be passed, it provides at least the hope that the threat of closer scrutiny in a referendum will be a warning sign to the Governments as well as Parliaments and help to make sure that only legislation that is really required will be put on the statute book.
7-Nov-2011
 

Euro Crisis: desperate measures lack democratic legitimacy


One may be a supporter of the Euro or a fervent critic but one aspect that is mostly overlooked in the present debate about the future of the Euro is the fact that no consideration is given to the wishes of the citizens in the countries that are affected by the turmoil in the financial markets.

The politicians in most member states of the Euro-zone (and the technocrats that do their bidding) have introduced the Euro without bothering to ask for the agreement of their electorates. Now they are reaping the results of their authoritarian measure and try to get out of the problem by forcing even more authoritarian measures on their citizens.
17-Aug-11


For more comments on current issues of public concern and how the introduction of Direct Democracy may help to foster a more rational approach go to our Blog

 



 



Why you should support Dirdem


Are you angry when people want to control your life?

Are you angry when people want to live off the fruit of your work?

Are you angry when people want to tell you what to think?

If your answer is YES to any or all of the above questions then you should support our Movement.


DIRDEM is more than a traditional political party. We do not see this cause of a career choice - or stepping stone leading to a lucrative career in the private sector.

DIRDEM is not a Think Tank that publishes lengthy reports that are only read by a few insiders and later disappear in some library of filing cabinet.

DIRDEM is not a lobby or special interest group that tries to gain advantage at the expense of other groups of society.

DIRDEM is not a religion or ideology and does not try to make people believe in something except in the belief that no one should be allowed to rule our lives.
 

Decisions you would be able to influence:

By giving the reader examples of recent policy decisions we highlight the dramatic impact the introduction of Direct Democracy would have on the political life of all countries.

All the following decisions where taken without the participation of the affected citizens. Some - if not most - were highly controversial and have a negative effect for at least some major parts of the country's population.

The present system of government not only leaves the citizens powerless in the face of a never-ending tide of legislation, it also inevitably leads to inefficient use of taxpayer's money and a steady erosion of civil liberties.

See what decisions the citizens could influence directly in a proper democratic system


 

 

 Disclaimer l Home
Copyright Dirdem 2012 All rights reserved